[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALKntY1XnHG7BAnu4yYU_8iwDttAhuxqu1bBu7YuxXMP4nF+JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 08:56:34 -0700
From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux page table
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Xin Tong wrote:
>
>> When a process is created in Linux, corresponding page table is
>> implemented. In the current x86 linux, the page table is a multi-level
>> page table and CR3 points to the first level of the page table. I
>> have 2 questions.
>>
>> 1. is the value in CR3 virtual address or physical address ?
>
> Physical, otherwise you will have chicken-egg problem.
>
>> 2. can the address of the first level of the page table during a
>> process's lifetime change ?
>
> In theory it would be possible to implement. But I don't see a scenario
> when it might be useful.
>
>> 3. can two different processes have their CR3 being the same value
>> even though they have different first level page tables ?
>
> Yes, if they are created by clone(CLONE_VM). In such case they share the
> same mm_struct, and therefore mm_struct->pgd (which is exactly what is
> loaded into cr3 in switch_mm()) is the same.
>
Is this the COW mechanism in linux. what if the cloned process need to
have set of its own pages later. do the CR3s for the 2 processes
become different at that point ?
> LKML is however very inappropriate list for such questions. Please ask on
> kernelnewbies list next time.
>
Thank you for letting me know. Will do next time.
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists