[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1209020935390.20709@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 09:37:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: unconditionally call Yama
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
> Given that several distros use (or want to use) Yama, I think that's
> reason enough for this. I think it's important for us to take a
> practical approach here, and having the big LSMs each hook Yama instead
> of doing this in a single global place will make it needlessly
> duplicated code.
With my SUSE hat on, I would be really reluctant to enable config option
in the distribution kernel that will make attaching gdb to running
processess impossible without any further tuning (like sysctl/procfs knob
to explicitly enable this feature).
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists