[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaHm9YZjM7GzZ-VEPgQfn86XrjdO1ZYWMuohCQH1PshZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:32:12 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver core
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> wrote:
> there is a v3 of the patch under internal review right now.
OK I'll review as you send it out. Will look through the v2 patches to
see if I missed some comment.
> I know Stephen will not like it, but I decided not to have the list of
> functions passed statically from the SoC specific part but generate it
> out of pingroups during probe().
Well, Tony's driver does even nastier things so we need to agree
to disagree on this point. I for one can live with it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists