[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120903152525.GA9028@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:25:25 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: single-step fixes
Hello.
In short: uprobes should not use user_enable/disable_single_step().
This is unneeded and wrong.
Sebastian, I changed your patches a bit:
1/7:
- Change the subject and update the changelog. In particular,
s/utrace/uprobes/. I am wondering where this typo came from ;)
2/7:
- Rename UPROBE_TF_CHANGES to UPROBE_FIX_SETF to match other
*_FIX_* defines.
- Update the changelog.
- !!!REMOVE send_sig(SIGTRAP) from arch_uprobe_disable_step!!!
Didn't I ask you to make a separate patch for this change? ;)
This "else send_sig(SIGTRAP)" is very wrong. Just suppose an
application does asm ("pushf; popf") and the 2nd insn is probed.
And otoh this is not enough.
See 6/7.
please let me know if you disagree.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists