linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: pass 'nf_hook_ops' instead of 'list_head' to nf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:31:51 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	coreteam@...filter.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: pass 'nf_hook_ops' instead of
 'list_head' to nf_queue()

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:00:06PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Since 'list_for_each_continue_rcu' has already been replaced by
> 'list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu', pass 'list_head' to nf_queue() as a
> parameter can not benefit us any more.
> 
> This patch will replace 'list_head' with 'nf_hook_ops' as the parameter of
> nf_queue() and __nf_queue() to save code.

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/