lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:16:22 +0200
From:	Roland Stigge <>
To:	Wolfram Sang <>
CC:	Kevin Wells <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	Srinivas Bakki <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

Hi Wolfram,

On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do
>> believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a
>> number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't
>> think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in
>> NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that
>> part (including the user manual).
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then.

Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where?
i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-)

Thanks in advance,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists