lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLFKQtJM1sjeBaoMjmVaOUyXf1DHMaBuEohCLgaRFLr+KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Sep 2012 08:32:36 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 09/13] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
>
> Update code that previously assumed pfns [ 0 - max_low_pfn_mapped ) and
> [ 4GB - max_pfn_mapped ) were always direct mapped, to now look up
> pfn_mapped ranges instead.

What problem does this fix? How did you find about it?

> -v2: change applying sequence to keep git bisecting working.
>      so add dummy pfn_range_is_mapped(). - Yinghai Lu
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>

Yinghai's sign-off is missing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ