[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLFKQtJM1sjeBaoMjmVaOUyXf1DHMaBuEohCLgaRFLr+KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 08:32:36 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 09/13] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
>
> Update code that previously assumed pfns [ 0 - max_low_pfn_mapped ) and
> [ 4GB - max_pfn_mapped ) were always direct mapped, to now look up
> pfn_mapped ranges instead.
What problem does this fix? How did you find about it?
> -v2: change applying sequence to keep git bisecting working.
> so add dummy pfn_range_is_mapped(). - Yinghai Lu
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Yinghai's sign-off is missing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists