[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-JApY3-4eBn5mDv_fB8JweHDUqdUX7y6ChTkuYbJNjVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:08:38 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: remove redundent call to fat_detach in vfat_unlink
2012/9/1, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:48:07PM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> As after file is removed fat_evict_inode will be called and fat_detach
>> will be called from that place. So, fat_detach can be removed from
>> vfat_unlink
>
> NAK. Please, realize that unlink and destruction of file are separate
> operations. ->evict_inode() may be called long after ->unlink(); moreover,
> during that time you might have another file created, getting the
> same directory entry our file used to have.
>
> This is Unix, damnit. You *can* open file, then unlink it and that file
> will keep existing (i.e. you can write to that descriptor, read, etc.)
> until it's closed.
>
Hi Al.
Sorry for noise. I understand what you said.
There was some confusing to me while checking fat's estale issue.:)
I will re-post patch-set about fat estale issue soon.(fix side-effect
informed by you and ogawa)
I am grateful that you review these patches also if you have time.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists