[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQW9-aCEh9ArHKYaTyz+robiZv6dB-VhC5ggecWrH+7ShQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:21:01 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 12/13] x86, mm: Use func pointer to table size
calculation and mapping.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> +static void __init with_all_ram_ranges(
>> + void (*work_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *),
>> + void *data)
>
>> +static void __init size_work_fn(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, void *data)
>
>> +static void __init mapping_work_fn(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>> + void *data)
>
> So I passionately hate the naming convention. How about something
> similar to mm/pagewalk.c:
>
> s/with_all_ram_ranges/walk_ram_ranges/g
ok.
>
> s/size_work_fn/table_space_size/g
>
> s/mapping_work_fn/map_memory/g
I would prefer simple one size_work_fn, and mapping_working_fn.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists