linux-kernel - Why exported const value modified by another driver not updated in original driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKgH8Ah-aq=LfOWs2SBZnndzugNGxJbqYS11YVQLXJy6FZxkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:00:16 +0530
From:	Manavendra Nath Manav <mnm.kernel@...il.com>
To:	kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Why exported const value modified by another driver not updated in
 original driver

Hi,

I have declared a static const int variable in one driver and exported
that variable symbol. In another driver i am modifying that variable.
The other driver prints the modified value but the original driver
retains the original value. When both virtual and physical addresses
of the variable as seen by both drivers are same, how is this even
possible. Is it a kernel bug?

[root@...alhost bug]# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 3.5.3 #3 SMP Mon Sep 3 21:52:12 IST 2012
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

================================
[root@...alhost bug]# cat driver.c
#include <linux/module.h>

static const int value = 123;

int init_module()
{
	printk("Base driver (init): value                     = %d\n", value);
	printk("Base driver (init): virtual address of value  = %p\n", (void *)&value);
	printk("Base driver (init): physical address of value = %p\n", (void
*)__pa(&value));
	return 0;
}

void cleanup_module()
{
	printk("Base driver (exit): value                     = %d\n", value);
	printk("Base driver (exit): virtual address of value  = %p\n", (void *)&value);
	printk("Base driver (exit): physical address of value = %p\n", (void
*)__pa(&value));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(value);

==============================================
[root@...alhost bug]# cat hacker.c
#include <linux/module.h>

extern int value;

int init_module()
{
	value = 987;
	printk("Hacker driver (init): value                     = %d\n", value);
	printk("Hacker Base driver (init): virtual address of value  = %p\n",
(void *)&value);
	printk("Hacker Base driver (init): physical address of value = %p\n",
(void *)__pa(&value));
	return 0;
}

void cleanup_module()
{
	printk("Hacker driver (exit): value                     = %d\n", value);
	printk("Hacker driver (exit): virtual address of value  = %p\n",
(void *)&value);
	printk("Hacker driver (exit): physical address of value = %p\n",
(void *)__pa(&value));
	return;
}

=========================================
[root@...alhost bug]# insmod driver.ko
Base driver (init): value                     = 123
Base driver (init): virtual address of value  = f89d61c8
Base driver (init): physical address of value = 389d61c8

[root@...alhost bug]# insmod hacker.ko
Hacker driver (init): value                     = 987
Hacker Base driver (init): virtual address of value  = f89d61c8
Hacker Base driver (init): physical address of value = 389d61c8

[root@...alhost bug]# rmmod hacker.ko
Hacker driver (exit): value                     = 987
Hacker driver (exit): virtual address of value  = f89d61c8
Hacker driver (exit): physical address of value = 389d61c8

[root@...alhost bug]# rmmod driver.ko
Base driver (exit): value                     = 123
Base driver (exit): virtual address of value  = f89d61c8
Base driver (exit): physical address of value = 389d61c8

[root@...alhost bug]# cat /proc/kallsyms | grep value
f89f91c8 R value	[driver]
f89f9088 r __ksymtab_value	[driver]
f89f91cc r __kstrtab_value	[driver]

Interestingly, when i change the declaration of variable to "volatile"
in driver.c as "static const volatile int" then the driver.ko prints
modified value "987" during rmmod and the original value "123" is
lost. What is the difference between this and previous declaration?
Please forgive if you find this question silly?
--
Manavendra Nath Manav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/