[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8439412.RChiDciQdh@fat-tyre>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:32:01 +0200
From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: FLUSH/FUA documentation & code discrepancy
Hi,
I think commit 1e87901e18 was wrong. Starting with that commit the REQ_FLUSH
and REQ_FUA bits get stripped away if the queue does not advertise REQ_FLUSH
or REQ_FUA support.
But the REQ_FLUSH bit is also tested for when not merging requests
(blk_queue_bio()) or when it comes to the elevator (blk_flush_plug_list()).
So, since this patch the elevator reorders write requests on queues that
do not have REQ_FLUSH or REQ_FUA set.
While on queues that have REQ_FLUSH or REQ_FUA set, the elevator does
not reorder writes across FLUSHes.
The Documentation/block/writeback_cache_control.txt file says:
--snip--
Implementation details for filesystems
--------------------------------------
Filesystems can simply set the REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA bits and do not have to
worry if the underlying devices need any explicit cache flushing and how
the Forced Unit Access is implemented. The REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA flags
may both be set on a single bio.
--snap--
I have the impression every file system lets IO drain, and issues a
flush afterwards with the blkdev_issue_flush() function. BTW that
function turns into a non-obvious no-op as soon as the queue does not
have the REQ_FUA or REQ_FLUSH bits set. It does not look like it is
a no-op by intention.
The file systems seem to be all fine, only in DRBD we have a mode were
we depend on REQ_FUA/REQ_FLUSH requests being real boundaries for reordering
of writes. This is broken since the mentioned commit as we recently found out.
I suggest that either this commit gets reverted, or the documentation
is updated. I am ready to prepare such a patch, but I need directions
how it should be fixed.
Best regards,
Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists