[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120904034100.GA21602@moria.home.lan>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:41:00 -0700
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org,
bharrosh@...asas.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by
stacking drivers
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 04:41:37PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> ... or another possibility - start a timer when something is put to
> current->bio_list and use that timer to pop entries off current->bio_list
> and submit them to a workqueue. The timer can be cpu-local so only
> interrupt masking is required to synchronize against the timer.
>
> This would normally run just like the current kernel and in case of
> deadlock, the timer would kick in and resolve the deadlock.
Ugh. That's a _terrible_ idea.
Remember the old plugging code? You ever have to debug performance
issues caused by it?
>
> > I could be convinced, but right now I prefer my solution.
>
> It fixes bio allocation problem, but not other similar mempool problems in
> dm and md.
I looked a bit more, and actually I think the rest of the problem is
pretty limited in scope - most of those mempool allocations are per
request, not per split.
I'm willing to put some time into converting dm/md over to bioset's
front_pad. I'm having to learn the code for the immutable biovec work,
anyways.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists