linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by stacking drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120904194350.GD25236@google.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:43:50 -0700
From:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	bharrosh@...asas.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by
 stacking drivers

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:01:19PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Actually, if the timer approach can reduce the frequency of rescuer
> > involvement, I think it could actually be better.
> 
> Ooh, it wouldn't.  It's kicking in only after alloc failure.  I don't
> know.  I think conditioning it on alloc failure is cleaner and
> converting all per-bio allocations to front-pad makes sense.  Using a
> timer wouldn't make the mechanism any simpler, right?

Exactly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/