[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120904213742.0221543e@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:37:42 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter in a
secure boot environment
> Gotta say this capability name is confusing. Naming is
> CAP_PRE_SECURE_BOOT or something along the lines might be a better
> choice. When I just look at this name, I sure thought this
> CAP_SECURE_FIRMWARE true means it is a secure boot capable firmware.
Given there is nothing secure about it would it also be better to call it
AUTHENTICATED_BOOT ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists