linux-kernel - [PATCHv2 3/4] efi: Add a function to look up existing IO memory mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bb372ae906f121bc5e594cf2e8e21c948ee6f488.1346792566.git.josh@joshtriplett.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:24:08 -0700
From:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 3/4] efi: Add a function to look up existing IO memory
 mappings

The EFI initialization creates virtual mappings for EFI boot services
memory, so if a driver wants to access EFI boot services memory, it
cannot call ioremap itself; doing so will trip the WARN about mapping
RAM twice.  Thus, a driver accessing EFI boot services memory must do so
via the existing mapping already created during EFI intiialization.
Since the EFI code already maintains a memory map for that memory, add a
function efi_lookup_mapped_addr to look up mappings in that memory map.

Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
---
 arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/efi.h         |    1 +
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index ab2cfe8..90023d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -777,6 +777,34 @@ static void __init runtime_code_page_mkexec(void)
 }
 
 /*
+ * We can't ioremap data in EFI boot services RAM, because we've already mapped
+ * it as RAM.  So, look it up in the existing EFI memory map instead.  Only
+ * callable after efi_enter_virtual_mode and before efi_free_boot_services.
+ */
+void __iomem *efi_lookup_mapped_addr(u64 phys_addr)
+{
+	void *p;
+	if (WARN_ON(!memmap.map))
+		return NULL;
+	for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
+		efi_memory_desc_t *md = p;
+		u64 size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
+		u64 end = md->phys_addr + size;
+		if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
+		    md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE &&
+		    md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA)
+			continue;
+		if (!md->virt_addr)
+			continue;
+		if (phys_addr >= md->phys_addr && phys_addr < end) {
+			phys_addr += md->virt_addr - md->phys_addr;
+			return (__force void __iomem *)phys_addr;
+		}
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
  * This function will switch the EFI runtime services to virtual mode.
  * Essentially, look through the EFI memmap and map every region that
  * has the runtime attribute bit set in its memory descriptor and update
diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index 3c72c27..00aa5de 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ extern void efi_free_boot_services(void);
 static void efi_enter_virtual_mode(void) {}
 static void efi_free_boot_services(void) {}
 #endif
+extern void __iomem *efi_lookup_mapped_addr(u64 phys_addr);
 extern u64 efi_get_iobase (void);
 extern u32 efi_mem_type (unsigned long phys_addr);
 extern u64 efi_mem_attributes (unsigned long phys_addr);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/