| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd8J09FPCTC-4WwfR+wSCTtfqUq1RYNh0V6=ahH4VsiASA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:45:42 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@...sung.com>,
Bonggil Bak <bgbak@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] udf: extent cache implementation for manipulating
block map
2012/9/3, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 31-08-12 12:51:58, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>>
>> While mapping logical blocks of a file to physical blocks on the
>> partition,
>> everytime UDF read file metadata from the begining which decrease
>> preformance.
>> The drawback of this scheme is more prominent while reading large files.
>> For example, while reading a large file of ~5GB, read speed will
>> gradually become less as we near the end of file because of the time
>> taken in calculating the corresponding physical block.
>>
>> This patch implements caching and remembers the location of the last read
>> extent. Instead of reading file metadata from begining, start from the
>> cached location.
Hi. Jan.
> Thanks for the patch. I like this much better than the previous one. Some
> comments are below:
Thank you~
>
>> diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
>> index 1a0588e..f4cc4e0 100644
>> --- a/fs/udf/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
>> @@ -357,8 +359,14 @@ static int udf_get_block(struct inode *inode,
>> sector_t block,
>> if (!phys)
>> goto abort;
>>
>> - if (new)
>> + if (new) {
>> + unsigned char lshift = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
>> set_buffer_new(bh_result);
>> + if (iinfo->cached_extent.sanity &&
>> + (iinfo->cached_extent.eblock > (block << lshift)))
>> + /* Block allocated for hole, invalidate cache */
>> + udf_clear_extent_cache(iinfo);
>> + }
>> map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, phys);
> Instead of this, you should change inode_getblk() to also use the extent
> cache (for initialization of prev_epos when appropriate) and then update
> the extent cache to the just found / created extent when the function is
> done.
Okay, I will check about your suggestion.
>
>> abort:
>> @@ -2132,11 +2144,12 @@ int8_t inode_bmap(struct inode *inode, sector_t
>> block,
>> struct udf_inode_info *iinfo;
>>
>> iinfo = UDF_I(inode);
>> - pos->offset = 0;
>> - pos->block = iinfo->i_location;
>> - pos->bh = NULL;
>> - *elen = 0;
>> -
>> + if (!udf_read_extent_cache(inode, bcount, &lbcount, pos)) {
>> + pos->offset = 0;
>> + pos->block = iinfo->i_location;
>> + pos->bh = NULL;
>> + }
>> + *elen = 0;
> There's TAB added here which doesn't make sense.
>
>> do {
>> etype = udf_next_aext(inode, pos, eloc, elen, 1);
>> if (etype == -1) {
> ...
>> @@ -2176,3 +2190,52 @@ long udf_block_map(struct inode *inode, sector_t
>> block)
>> else
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +int udf_read_extent_cache(struct inode *inode, loff_t bcount,
>> + loff_t *lbcount, struct extent_position *pos)
>> +{
>> + struct udf_inode_info *iinfo = UDF_I(inode);
>> + mutex_lock(&iinfo->i_extent_cache_lock);
>> + if ((iinfo->cached_extent.eblock <= bcount) &&
>> + (iinfo->cached_extent.sanity)) {
>> + /* Cache hit */
>> + *lbcount = iinfo->cached_extent.eblock;
>> + memcpy(pos, &iinfo->cached_extent.epos,
>> + sizeof(struct extent_position));
>> + mutex_unlock(&iinfo->i_extent_cache_lock);
>> + return 1;
>> + } else
>> + udf_clear_extent_cache(iinfo);
> It would be less confusing, if udf_read_extent_cache() didn't clear the
> cache in case of a miss. Then in udf_update_extent_cache() just clear the
> cache if it is still valid.
Okay, It is more effective! I will change ~
>
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&iinfo->i_extent_cache_lock);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +void udf_update_extent_cache(struct inode *inode, loff_t estart,
>> + struct extent_position *pos)
>> +{
>> + struct udf_inode_info *iinfo = UDF_I(inode);
>> + mutex_lock(&iinfo->i_extent_cache_lock);
>> + if (pos->bh != NULL)
>> + /* Increase ref count */
>> + get_bh(pos->bh);
>> + memcpy(&iinfo->cached_extent.epos, pos,
>> + sizeof(struct extent_position));
>> + iinfo->cached_extent.eblock = estart;
>> + iinfo->cached_extent.sanity = 1;
>> + switch (iinfo->i_alloc_type) {
>> + case ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_SHORT:
>> + iinfo->cached_extent.epos.offset -= sizeof(struct short_ad);
>> + break;
>> + case ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG:
>> + iinfo->cached_extent.epos.offset -= sizeof(struct long_ad);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&iinfo->i_extent_cache_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void udf_clear_extent_cache(struct udf_inode_info *iinfo)
>> +{
>> + if (iinfo->cached_extent.sanity) {
>> + brelse(iinfo->cached_extent.epos.bh);
>> + memset(&iinfo->cached_extent, 0, sizeof(struct udf_ext_cache));
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
> I think udf_clear_entent_cache() should take i_extent_cache_lock. Or if
> you are sure it's not needed, you need a good documentation why.
Documentation ? I am a little confusing.. It means udf.txt is in
Documentation/filesystem/ ?
or comment about clear extent function ?
>
>> diff --git a/fs/udf/udf_i.h b/fs/udf/udf_i.h
>> index bb8309d..ec3878a 100644
>> --- a/fs/udf/udf_i.h
>> +++ b/fs/udf/udf_i.h
>> @@ -1,6 +1,20 @@
>> #ifndef _UDF_I_H
>> #define _UDF_I_H
>>
>> +struct extent_position {
>> + struct buffer_head *bh;
>> + uint32_t offset;
>> + struct kernel_lb_addr block;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct udf_ext_cache {
>> + /* Extent position */
>> + struct extent_position epos;
>> + /* Start logical block */
>> + loff_t eblock;
> Well, this is really in bytes not blocks, isn't it? Then call it like
> 'lstart' and add a comment that it's in bytes.
Yes, It is in bytes. And I will add comment.
>
>> + int8_t sanity;
> Make this 'bool' and call it 'valid'. That's more common.
Okay, I will modify bool.
Thanks a lot. Jan!
>
> Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists