linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 14/17] input: RMI4 F30 GPIO/LED control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50469CAC.7050608@synaptics.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:28:28 -0700
From:	Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Allie Xiong <axiong@...aptics.com>,
	William Manson <wmanson@...aptics.com>,
	Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@...il.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/17] input: RMI4 F30 GPIO/LED control

On 08/27/2012 03:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> GPIO/LED, nice since I'm a GPIO maintainer I'll take a closer look.
>
> If the bus will start doing a lot of non-input business it should live under
> drivers/mfd but I think this is just one exception, right?
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com> wrote:
>
> (...)
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f30.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f30.c
>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/rmi.h>
>> +#include <linux/input.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include "rmi_driver.h"
>
> The non-existance of <linux/gpio.h> and <linux/leds.h> tells us that something
> is very wrong.
>
> You should not model these GPIOs and LEDs by a set of obscure
> sysfs attributes, instead use the proper kernel subsystems that
> already exist for handling this! LEDs and GPIOs already have their
> own (standardized) userspace sysfs interfaces.
>
> Reading the code I see that this is what happens here, so please rewrite
> this to be a real GPIO+LED driver using struct gpio_chip and
> the same for LEDs.
>
> Be inspired by drivers/gpio/* and drivers/leds/*

Roger.  We'll rework this and resubmit at a later date.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/