[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120905063524.GA20710@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:35:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, eranian@...gle.com, mingo@...e.hu,
andi@...stfloor.org, avi@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: Disable uncore on virtualized CPU.
* Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com> wrote:
> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
>
> Initializing uncore PMU on virtualized CPU may hang the kernel.
> This is because kvm does not emulate the entire hardware. Thers
> are lots of uncore related MSRs, making kvm enumerate them all
> is a non-trival task. So just disable uncore on virtualized CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> index 0a55710..2f005ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> @@ -2898,6 +2898,9 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
> if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + if (cpu_has_hypervisor)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> ret = uncore_pci_init();
> if (ret)
> goto fail;
Cannot the presence of the uncore hardware be detected in a
cleaner fashion, via the PCI config space and such?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists