| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CANN689Gg9MAzoJ6Yfa0USgD74+Ga+jrecS+a7DaZuMMfKizZPQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:45:19 -0700 From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, riel@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com, daniel.santos@...ox.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm: fix potential anon_vma locking issue in mprotect() On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com> wrote: > I would suggest to do the strict fix as above in as patch 1/8 and push > it in -mm, and to do only the optimization removal in 3/8. I think > we want it in -stable too later, so it'll make life easier to > cherry-pick the commit if it's merged independently. All right. So I did this and the strict fix got into Andrew's tree as mm-fix-potential-anon_vma-locking-issue-in-mprotect.patch Andrew: when you try applying this series, this patch (2/7) won't apply due to the strict fix being already there. Please just skip it (and replace patch 4/7 with the replacement I'm about to send, so that we end up with the same end state) -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists