[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5047161F.60503@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:06:39 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <davej@...hat.com>, <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <pjt@...gle.com>,
<lennart@...ttering.net>, <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] forced comounts for cgroups.
On 09/05/2012 01:07 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Glauber.
>
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:55:21PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> So, I think it's desirable for all controllers to be able to handle
>>> hierarchies the same way and to have the ability to tag something as
>>> belonging to certain group in the hierarchy for all controllers but I
>>> don't think it's desirable or feasible to require all of them to
>>> follow exactly the same grouping at all levels.
>>
>> By "different levels of granularity" do you mean having just a subset of
>> them turned on at a particular place?
>
> Heh, this is tricky to describe and I'm not really following what you
> mean.
Do we really want to start cleaning up all this by changing the
interface to something that is described as "tricky" ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists