linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/sys.c: call disable_nonboot_cpus in kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:51:36 +0800
From:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sys.c: call disable_nonboot_cpus in kernel_restart

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:36:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  3 Sep 2012 22:24:58 +0800
> Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Like kernel_power_off calls disable_nonboot_cpus, we may want to have
> > kernel_restart call disable_nonboot_cpus as well.  Doing so can help
> > the machines that require boot cpu be the last alive cpu during reboot
> > to survive with kernel restart.
> 
> That does sound logical.  But the changelog is very vague and fluffy. 
> Does this patch actually fix any known problem on any known machine?
> 
Yes, it fixes one reboot issue seen on imx6q (Cortex-A9 Quad).  The
machine requires the restart routine run on primary cpu than secondary
ones.  Otherwise, the secondary core running restart routine will fail
to come to online after reboot.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/