linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/26] rcu: New rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120905010422.GC2593@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:04:22 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
	Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/26] rcu: New rcu_user_enter() and
 rcu_user_exit() APIs

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:07:33PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:05:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > 
> > RCU currently insists that only idle tasks can enter RCU idle mode, which
> > prohibits an adaptive tickless kernel (AKA nohz cpusets), which in turn
> > would mean that usermode execution would always take scheduling-clock
> > interrupts, even when there is only one task runnable on the CPU in
> > question.
> > 
> > This commit therefore adds rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user_exit(), which
> > allow non-idle tasks to enter RCU idle mode.  These are quite similar
> > to rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit(), respectively, except that they
> > omit the idle-task checks.
> > 
> > [ Updated to use "user" flag rather than separate check functions. ]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
> > Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
> > Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> A few suggestions below: an optional microoptimization and some bugfixes.
> With the bugfixes, and with or without the microoptimization:

Good catches!  Due to conflicts with later commits, I added these as
a separate commit.

							Thanx, Paul

> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> 
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> [...]
> > -static void rcu_idle_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
> > +static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> > +				bool user)
> >  {
> >  	trace_rcu_dyntick("Start", oldval, 0);
> > -	if (!is_idle_task(current)) {
> > +	if (!is_idle_task(current) && !user) {
> 
> Microoptimization: putting the !user check first (here and in the exit
> function) would allow the compiler to partially inline rcu_eqs_*_common
> into the two trivial wrappers and constant-fold away the test for !user.
> 
> > +void rcu_idle_enter(void)
> > +{
> > +	rcu_eqs_enter(0);
> > +}
> 
> s/0/false/
> 
> > +void rcu_user_enter(void)
> > +{
> > +	rcu_eqs_enter(1);
> > +}
> 
> s/1/true/
> 
> > -static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
> > +static void rcu_eqs_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> > +			       int user)
> >  {
> >  	smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();  /* Force ordering w/previous sojourn. */
> >  	atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
> > @@ -464,7 +490,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
> >  	rcu_cleanup_after_idle(smp_processor_id());
> >  	trace_rcu_dyntick("End", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
> > -	if (!is_idle_task(current)) {
> > +	if (!is_idle_task(current) && !user) {
> 
> Same micro-optimization as the enter function.
> 
> > +void rcu_idle_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	rcu_eqs_exit(0);
> > +}
> 
> s/0/false/
> 
> > +void rcu_user_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	rcu_eqs_exit(1);
> > +}
> 
> s/1/true/
> 
> > @@ -539,7 +586,7 @@ void rcu_irq_enter(void)
> >  	if (oldval)
> >  		trace_rcu_dyntick("++=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
> >  	else
> > -		rcu_idle_exit_common(rdtp, oldval);
> > +		rcu_eqs_exit_common(rdtp, oldval, 1);
> 
> s/1/true/, and likewise in rcu_irq_exit.
> 
> - Josh Triplett
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/