lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda9_qK9jrJSAYo5NDiadrX2-J5mgMapY6pp__XzanUhZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:10:59 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: new type: pinctrl-single,bits

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> wrote:

> When configuring pinmux with pinctrl-single there could be a case when one
> register is used to configure mux for more than one pin.
> In this case the use of pinctrl-single,pins is a bit problematic since we can
> only update the whole register (restricted by the mask).
> In such a situations the pinctrl-single,bits could provide a safe way to handle
> the mux.
>
> pinctrl-single,bits takes three parameters: <reg offset, value, sub-mask>
> The sub mask is used to mask part of the register to make sure we do not change
> bits outside of the scope of this pin.
>
> The first patch in this series is to fix the previous pinctrl-since,pins
> implementation because it was not using the mask on the value which could result
> changed bits outside of the mask.

This looks sane to me, but I'd like Tony to ACK before I apply it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ