[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504768E2.3020706@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:59:46 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, gleb@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] kvm: Use a reserved IRQ source ID for irqfd
On 09/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:35:43PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 08/22/2012 03:41 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I assumed you were pointing out the level vs edge interaction. If we
>> >> call that a userspace bug, I can just drop this. Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Alex
>> >
>> > level is userspace bug I think :)
>>
>> I don't see how it's a bug. Suppose we have a vfio device that shares a
>> gsi with an emulated device. The emulated device naturally uses
>> KVM_IRQ_LINE (it has no need to re-sample on ADN), while vfio naturally
>> has to use irqfd.
>
> Absolutely. But vfio needs to use irqfd with the new flag.
> Using existing irqfd for level is a bug.
I see we're not reusing this irq source id for level irqfd. But I think
we should, there's no need for per-gsi irq source id. Plus I'd like to
fix the theoretical bug even if it doesn't bite in practice.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists