[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120905201238.GE13737@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:12:38 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller
Hello, Michal.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Can we settle on the following 3 steps?
> 1) warn about "flat" hierarchies (give it X releases) - I will push it
> to as many Suse code streams as possible (hope other distributions
> could do the same)
I think I'm just gonna trigger WARN from cgroup core if anyone tries
to create hierarchy with a controller which doesn't support full
hierarchy. WARN_ON_ONCE() at first and then WARN_ON() on each
creation later on.
> 2) flip the default on the root cgroup & warn when somebody tries to
> change it to 0 (give it another X releases) that the knob will be
> removed
> 3) remove the knob and the whole nonsese
> 4) revert 3 if somebody really objects
If we can get to 3, I don't think 4 would be a problem.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists