[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1346878886-7159-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:01:26 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix deadlock scenario with smp_send_stop()
If one process calls sys_reboot and that process then stops other
CPUs while those CPUs are within a spin_lock() region we can
potentially encounter a deadlock scenario like below.
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
spin_lock(my_lock)
smp_send_stop()
send_IPI handle_IPI()
disable_preemption/irqs
while(1);
<PREEMPT>
spin_lock(my_lock) <--- Waits forever
We shouldn't attempt to run any other tasks after we send a stop
IPI to a CPU so disable preemption so that the reboot task runs to
completion.
Reported-by: Sundarajan Srinivasan <sundaraj@...eaurora.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
---
Unfortunately this won't fix the other problem I mentioned two weeks
ago where smp_send_stop races with other CPUs calling cpu_up().
arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
index 693b744..663a7a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ __setup("reboot=", reboot_setup);
void machine_shutdown(void)
{
+ preempt_disable();
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
smp_send_stop();
#endif
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists