linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:59:47 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree

Hi Paul,

Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
kernel/sched/core.c between commit f319da0c6894 ("sched: Fix load avg vs
cpu-hotplug") from the tip tree and commit ead504e5600e ("sched: Fix load
avg vs cpu-hotplug") from the rcu tree.

These are 2 slightly different versions of the same patch :-( Same author
time, different commit times ...  The rcu tree version contains this
extra bit in the commit message:

"    [ paulmck: Move call to calc_load_migration to CPU_DEAD to avoid
     miscounting noted by Rakib. ]"

So I used it.  Let me know if this is not correct.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped