linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: support MIGRATE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120906053112.GA16231@bbox>
Date:	Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:31:12 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: support MIGRATE_DISCARD

Hi Mel,

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:56:11AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:11:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > This patch introudes MIGRATE_DISCARD mode in migration.
> > It drops *clean cache pages* instead of migration so that
> > migration latency could be reduced by avoiding (memcpy + page remapping).
> > It's useful for CMA because latency of migration is very important rather
> > than eviction of background processes's workingset. In addition, it needs
> > less free pages for migration targets so it could avoid memory reclaiming
> > to get free pages, which is another factor increase latency.
> > 
> 
> Bah, this was released while I was reviewing the older version. I did
> not read this one as closely but I see the enum problems have gone away
> at least. I'd still prefer if CMA had an additional helper to discard
> some pages with shrink_page_list() and migrate the remaining pages with
> migrate_pages(). That would remove the need to add a MIGRATE_DISCARD
> migrate mode at all.

I am not convinced with your point. What's the benefit on separating
reclaim and migration? For just removing MIGRATE_DISCARD mode?
I don't think it's not bad because my implementation is very simple(maybe
it's much simpler than separating reclaim and migration) and
could be used by others like memory-hotplug in future.
If you're not strong against with me, I would like to insist on my implementation.

> 
> -- 
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/