linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5048BD7A.7060408@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:12:58 +0200
From:	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
To:	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@...aro.org>
CC:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence

Hi Omar,

On 08/22/2012 07:42 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> For a reset sequence to complete cleanly, a module needs its
> associated clocks to be enabled, otherwise the timeout check
> in prcm code can print a false failure (failed to hardreset)
> that occurs because the clocks aren't powered ON and the status
> bit checked can't transition without them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> index eaedc33..b65e021 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> @@ -1509,6 +1509,7 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
>  {
>  	struct omap_hwmod_rst_info ohri;
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +	int hwsup = 0;
>  
>  	if (!oh)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1520,10 +1521,46 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
>  	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	if (oh->clkdm) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A clockdomain must be in SW_SUP otherwise reset
> +		 * might not be completed. The clockdomain can be set
> +		 * in HW_AUTO only when the module become ready.
> +		 */
> +		hwsup = clkdm_in_hwsup(oh->clkdm);
> +		ret = clkdm_hwmod_enable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> +		if (ret) {> 

> +			WARN(1, "omap_hwmod: %s: could not enable clockdomain %s: %d\n",
> +			     oh->name, oh->clkdm->name, ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	_enable_clocks(oh);
> +	if (soc_ops.enable_module)
> +		soc_ops.enable_module(oh);
> +
>  	ret = soc_ops.deassert_hardreset(oh, &ohri);
> +
> +	if (soc_ops.disable_module)
> +		soc_ops.disable_module(oh);
> +	_disable_clocks(oh);
> +
>  	if (ret == -EBUSY)
>  		pr_warning("omap_hwmod: %s: failed to hardreset\n", oh->name);
>  
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Set the clockdomain to HW_AUTO, assuming that the
> +		 * previous state was HW_AUTO.
> +		 */
> +		if (oh->clkdm && hwsup)
> +			clkdm_allow_idle(oh->clkdm);
> +	} else {
> +		if (oh->clkdm)
> +			clkdm_hwmod_disable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> +	}
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  

The sequence is good, I'm just a little bit concern about the
duplication of code compared to _enable sequence.

That being said, this is the consequence of removing the hardreset
sequence outside of the main _enable/_shutdown sequence.

So I'm not sure I have any better way of doing that :-(

Regards,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/