[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1209061255530.509@new-host-2>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:04:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
cc: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] drop vmtruncate
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:50:20 +0200
> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
> To: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: [PATCH 00/21] drop vmtruncate
>
> Hi all,
>
> with this patch series I try to clean the vmtruncate code. The theory of
> operation:
>
> old new
> vmtruncate() => inode_newsize_ok+truncate_setsize+fs truncate
>
> Where vmtruncate was used without any error check, the code now is:
>
> if (inode_newsize_ok() == 0) {
> truncate_setsize();
> fs truncate();
> }
>
> So, performance and semantic nothing change at all. I think that maybe in some
> point we can skip inode_newsize_ok (where the error check of vmtruncate wasn't
> used) but since there is a swap check in case of no-extension, maybe it's
> better to avoid regressions. After this clean, of course, each fs can clean in
> a deeply way.
>
> With these patches even the inode truncate callback is deleted.
>
> Any comments/feedback/bugs are welcome.
Could you explain the reason behind this change a little bit more ?
This does not make any sense to me since you're replacing
vmtruncate() which does basically
if (inode_newsize_ok() == 0) {
truncate_setsize();
fs truncate();
}
as you mentioned above by exactly the same thing but doing it within
the file system. It does not seem like an improvement to me ... how
is this a clean up ?
Thanks!
-Lukas
>
> Marco Stornelli (21):
> ufs: drop vmtruncate
> sysv: drop vmtruncate
> reiserfs: drop vmtruncate
> procfs: drop vmtruncate
> omfs: drop vmtruncate
> ocfs2: drop vmtruncate
> adfs: drop vmtruncate
> affs: drop vmtruncate
> bfs: drop vmtruncate
> hfs: drop vmtruncate
> hpfs: drop vmtruncate
> jfs: drop vmtruncate
> hfsplus: drop vmtruncate
> hostfs: drop vmtruncate
> logfs: drop vmtruncate
> minix: drop vmtruncate
> ncpfs: drop vmtruncate
> nilfs2: drop vmtruncate
> ntfs: drop vmtruncate
> vfs: drop vmtruncate
> mm: drop vmtruncate
>
> fs/adfs/inode.c | 5 +++--
> fs/affs/file.c | 8 +++++---
> fs/affs/inode.c | 5 ++++-
> fs/bfs/file.c | 5 +++--
> fs/hfs/inode.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> fs/hfsplus/inode.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c | 8 +++++---
> fs/hpfs/file.c | 8 +++++---
> fs/hpfs/inode.c | 5 ++++-
> fs/jfs/file.c | 6 ++++--
> fs/jfs/inode.c | 13 +++++++++----
> fs/libfs.c | 2 --
> fs/logfs/readwrite.c | 10 ++++++++--
> fs/minix/file.c | 6 ++++--
> fs/minix/inode.c | 7 +++++--
> fs/ncpfs/inode.c | 4 +++-
> fs/nilfs2/file.c | 1 -
> fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> fs/nilfs2/recovery.c | 7 +++++--
> fs/ntfs/file.c | 8 +++++---
> fs/ntfs/inode.c | 11 +++++++++--
> fs/ntfs/inode.h | 4 ++++
> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 3 ++-
> fs/omfs/file.c | 12 ++++++++----
> fs/proc/base.c | 3 ++-
> fs/proc/generic.c | 3 ++-
> fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 3 ++-
> fs/reiserfs/file.c | 3 +--
> fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h | 1 +
> fs/sysv/file.c | 5 +++--
> fs/sysv/itree.c | 7 +++++--
> fs/ufs/inode.c | 5 +++--
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 -
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 -
> mm/truncate.c | 23 -----------------------
> 36 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists