linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/5] forced comounts for cgroups.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:45:47 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, davej@...hat.com, ben@...adent.org.uk,
	pjt@...gle.com, lennart@...ttering.net, kay.sievers@...y.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] forced comounts for cgroups.

Hello, Glauber.

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
> Yes, please.
>
> While you rightfully claim that you explained it a couple of times, it
> all seems to be quite fuzzy. I don't blame it on you: the current state
> of the interface leads to this.

Heh, I drank two cups of coffee and two glasses of wine that evening.
Coffee won and I couldn't sleep till around 4am with splitting
headache. I'm not too confident about what I wrote that night. :)

> So another detailed explanation of what you envision at this point,
> considering the discussions we had in the previous days, would be really
> helpful,

Definitely, will do. Please give me a few days to sort through
immediately pending stuff.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/