[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120907081501.GA17749@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:15:03 +0800
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leela Krishna Amudala <leelakrishna.a@...il.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:04:24PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> If e.g. the power on sequence fails at step N (of M steps for that sequence),
> one could try playing the corresponding power off sequence (either completely
> of from step M - N), but then again we cannot rely on sequences to be
> perfectly symetrical. Maybe this is more something for the calling driver to
> check for and control?
That had been my thought too - depending on what the sequence is for it
may be that the corrective action is something very different to
reversing the sequence, for example a device reset may be required.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists