linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 01/10] audit: remove unnecessary NULL ptr checks from do_path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1347017027-17167-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri,  7 Sep 2012 07:23:38 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:	eparis@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc:	linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bfields@...ldses.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 01/10] audit: remove unnecessary NULL ptr checks from do_path_lookup

As best I can tell, whenever retval == 0, nd->path.dentry and nd->inode
are also non-NULL. Eliminate those checks and the superfluous
audit_context check.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
---
 fs/namei.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index dd1ed1b..e3661762 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1976,12 +1976,8 @@ static int do_path_lookup(int dfd, const char *name,
 	if (unlikely(retval == -ESTALE))
 		retval = path_lookupat(dfd, name, flags | LOOKUP_REVAL, nd);
 
-	if (likely(!retval)) {
-		if (unlikely(!audit_dummy_context())) {
-			if (nd->path.dentry && nd->inode)
-				audit_inode(name, nd->path.dentry);
-		}
-	}
+	if (likely(!retval))
+		audit_inode(name, nd->path.dentry);
 	return retval;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.11.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/