[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120907132955.GH29340@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:29:55 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
HACHIMI Samir <shachimi@...neo-embedded.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benoît Thébaudeau
<benoit.thebaudeau@...ansee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] ARM i.MX53: Add pwms to dtsi
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:07:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:32:20AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:48:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
[...]
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c | 4 ++++
> > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > index cd37165..7ec17e4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > @@ -189,6 +189,20 @@
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + pwm1: pwm@...b4000 {
> > > + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >
> > pwm-cells should be 2?
>
> Yes, right. We have a patch internally that allows us to pass a
> 'inverted' flag to the pwm, hence I accidently have 3 here.
There are patches in for-next that add support for setting the PWM
polarity, though there's currently no support for specifying it via a
third cell in the specifier. Would you mind sharing the patches that add
this?
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists