[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120907144717.GA22059@leaf>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:47:17 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used
from interrupt context
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:24:41AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09:40PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:54 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > Not sure I see much difference in aesthetics between the three approaches,
> > > > > but am willing to switch over to a generally agreed-upon scheme.
> > > >
> > > > Steve, could I get an ack from you on the patch I sent?
> > >
> > > I acked it, but do you just want me to take the patch? I'm getting ready
> > > for another 3.7 push to tip.
> >
> > Up to Paul. What would make it easiest to coordinate that patch and the
> > corresponding bits in the RCU patch series?
>
> All I need to do is to eventually remove the exports, correct?
> If so, full speed ahead!
Sounds like you could go ahead and remove the exports now, and just make
sure Steve's push goes in before yours.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists