lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347039854.6288.8.camel@thor>
Date:	Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:44:14 -0400
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
Subject: [RFC] x86: mtrr: Constrain WB MTRR to max phys mem prior to cleanup

If BIOS maps all or most of the phys address space as write-back,
regardless of the amount of actual RAM, then mtrr_cleanup may create
superfluous MTRR entries, or may be unable to create an optimal map
(or may use all MTRRs attempting to do so, thus making cleanup
pointless). Ideally, WB MTRRs should not be used for physical memory
addresses where memory does not exist (Intel SDM, Vol 3A, 11.11.2.1).

For example, Dell Precision T5400 wkstn w/ rev. A04 BIOS constructs
the following MTRR map for 10GB memory:
 kernel: [    0.000000] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
 kernel: [    0.000000]   0 base 0000000000 mask 2000000000 write-back
 kernel: [    0.000000]   1 base 00CFF00000 mask 3FFFF00000 uncachable
 kernel: [    0.000000]   2 base 00D0000000 mask 3FF0000000 uncachable
 kernel: [    0.000000]   3 base 00E0000000 mask 3FE0000000 uncachable
 kernel: [    0.000000]   4 base 1FF0000000 mask 3FF0000000 uncachable
 kernel: [    0.000000]   5 disabled
 kernel: [    0.000000]   6 disabled
 kernel: [    0.000000]   7 disabled
 kernel: [    0.000000] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0 ......
 kernel: [    0.000000] original variable MTRRs
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 128GB, type WB
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 1, base: 3327MB, range: 1MB, type UC
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 2, base: 3328MB, range: 256MB, type UC
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 3, base: 3584MB, range: 512MB, type UC
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 4, base: 130816MB, range: 256MB, type UC
 kernel: [    0.000000] total RAM covered: 130047M

mtrr_cleanup cannot construct an optimal map for this configuration.
Additionally, if the mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size is specified,
mtrr_cleanup will use all entries attempting to map the full 128GB
phys address range.

If a WB MTRR entry which maps phys addr range [0, > max_pfn) exists,
constrain the entry to [0, roundup_pow_of_two(max_pfn) ) prior to
generating potential solutions. The example MTRR map is optimized to:
 kernel: [    0.000000] New variable MTRRs
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 2GB, type WB
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 1, base: 2GB, range: 1GB, type WB
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 2, base: 3GB, range: 256MB, type WB
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 3, base: 3327MB, range: 1MB, type UC
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 4, base: 4GB, range: 4GB, type WB
 kernel: [    0.000000] reg 5, base: 8GB, range: 8GB, type WB

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
index bdda2e6..ee399c3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
@@ -714,6 +714,16 @@ int __init mtrr_cleanup(unsigned address_bits)
 	if (mtrr_tom2)
 		x_remove_size = (mtrr_tom2 >> PAGE_SHIFT) - x_remove_base;
 
+	/* Constrain a WB entry that maps entire phys addr space to max mem */
+	for (i = 0; i < num_var_ranges; i++) {
+		if (range_state[i].type == MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK &&
+		    range_state[i].base_pfn == 0 &&
+		    range_state[i].size_pfn > max_pfn) {
+			range_state[i].size_pfn = roundup_pow_of_two(max_pfn);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
 	nr_range = x86_get_mtrr_mem_range(range, 0, x_remove_base, x_remove_size);
 	/*
 	 * [0, 1M) should always be covered by var mtrr with WB
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ