linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 11/31] arm64: IRQ handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201209071937.19156.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:37:18 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/31] arm64: IRQ handling

On Friday 07 September 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> +#define __inc_irq_stat(cpu, member)	__IRQ_STAT(cpu, member)++
> +#define __get_irq_stat(cpu, member)	__IRQ_STAT(cpu, member)

Isn't this something that the IRQ core code already keeps track of?

> +#endif /* __ASM_HARDIRQ_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a4e1cad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_IRQ_H
> +#define __ASM_IRQ_H
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/irq.h>
> +
> +extern void (*handle_arch_irq)(struct pt_regs *);
> +
> +#endif

Is this one still needed?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/