[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120907165626.c9b842b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:56:26 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Fries <david@...es.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc_sysfs_show_hctosys 0 if resume failed
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:19:31 -0500
David Fries <david@...es.net> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] rtc_sysfs_show_hctosys 0 if resume failed
This doesn't make much sense. Did you mean "rtc_sysfs_show_hctosys():
display 0 if resume failed"?
> The original rtc_sysfs_show_hctosys returnd 1 if this device was the
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE device, a later patch checked
> rtc_hctosys_ret from boot, this verifies boot do_settimeofday
> succeeded, and sets rtc_hctosys_ret in resume to indicate when
> adjusting the clock from resume fails.
>
> This uses only CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE for conditional compilation
> instead of it and CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS. rtc_hctosys_ret was moved to
> class.c so rtc_hctosys can be removed with just a Kconfig change if
> boot time setting isn't desired.
And this makes my head spin. What does the patch actually do? I think
it might fix a bug, but it's unclear what that bug is.
Can you please write a better changelog and title and resend?
Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists