[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120908194115.GC12773@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 12:41:15 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Prep work for immutable bio vecs
Hello, Kent.
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:59:11PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Random assortment of refactoring and trivial cleanups.
>
> Immutable bio vecs and efficient bio splitting require auditing and removing
> pretty much all bi_idx uses, among other things.
>
> The reason is that with immutable bio vecs we can't use the bvec array
> directly; if we have a partially completed bvec, that'll be indicated with a
> field in struct bvec_iter (which gets embedded in struct bio) - bi_bvec_done.
>
> bio_for_each_segments() will handle this transparently, so code needs to be
> converted to use it or some other generic accessor.
>
> Also, bio splitting means that when a driver gets a bio, bi_idx and
> bi_bvec_done may both be nonzero. Again, just need to use generic accessors.
There are three pending patchsets and I don't know how they're
supposed to come together. Please explain on which tree the patches
are based and how they stack and preferably provide a git branch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists