[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120907205418.244bd797@corrin.poochiereds.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:54:18 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, eparis@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] vfs: getname/putname overhaul
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:26:56 -0700
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > This patchset is a first pass at overhauling the getname/putname
> > interface to use a struct. The idea here is to add a new getname_info
> > struct that allow us to pass around some auxillary info along with
> > the string that getname() returns.
>
> Couldn't you just use some of the free pointers in struct page?
> (lru etc.)
>
> -Andi
>
We could do that if these were page allocations. They're not, however.
__getname() does a PATH_MAX size allocation out of a slabcache. I get
the impression that at one point, this was done with page allocations.
I assume that this was changed over to a slabcache since not all arches
have a 4k PAGE_SIZE.
That's not a bad idea though. We could switch __getname over to doing a
page allocation instead, but it would mean quite a bit of wasted space
on arches with >4k pages. That said, these allocations are generally
quite short-lived so maybe that's not such a big deal.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists