linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/10] mm, slub: Rename slab_alloc() -> slab_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1347137279-17568-9-git-send-email-elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat,  8 Sep 2012 17:47:58 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] mm, slub: Rename slab_alloc() -> slab_alloc_node() to match SLAB

This patch does not fix anything, and its only goal is to enable us
to obtain some common code between SLAB and SLUB.
Neither behavior nor produced code is affected.

Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>
---
 mm/slub.c |   24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index c67bd0a..786a181 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2311,7 +2311,7 @@ new_slab:
  *
  * Otherwise we can simply pick the next object from the lockless free list.
  */
-static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s,
+static __always_inline void *slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
 		gfp_t gfpflags, int node, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	void **object;
@@ -2381,9 +2381,15 @@ redo:
 	return object;
 }
 
+static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s,
+		gfp_t gfpflags, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	return slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE, addr);
+}
+
 void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags)
 {
-	void *ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_);
+	void *ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, _RET_IP_);
 
 	trace_kmem_cache_alloc(_RET_IP_, ret, s->object_size, s->size, gfpflags);
 
@@ -2394,7 +2400,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc);
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
 void *kmem_cache_alloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, size_t size)
 {
-	void *ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_);
+	void *ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, _RET_IP_);
 	trace_kmalloc(_RET_IP_, ret, size, s->size, gfpflags);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -2412,7 +2418,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_order_trace);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node)
 {
-	void *ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, _RET_IP_);
+	void *ret = slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node, _RET_IP_);
 
 	trace_kmem_cache_alloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret,
 				    s->object_size, s->size, gfpflags, node);
@@ -2426,7 +2432,7 @@ void *kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,
 				    gfp_t gfpflags,
 				    int node, size_t size)
 {
-	void *ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, _RET_IP_);
+	void *ret = slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node, _RET_IP_);
 
 	trace_kmalloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret,
 			   size, s->size, gfpflags, node);
@@ -3364,7 +3370,7 @@ void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
 		return s;
 
-	ret = slab_alloc(s, flags, NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_);
+	ret = slab_alloc(s, flags, _RET_IP_);
 
 	trace_kmalloc(_RET_IP_, ret, size, s->size, flags);
 
@@ -3407,7 +3413,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
 		return s;
 
-	ret = slab_alloc(s, flags, node, _RET_IP_);
+	ret = slab_alloc_node(s, flags, node, _RET_IP_);
 
 	trace_kmalloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret, size, s->size, flags, node);
 
@@ -4035,7 +4041,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags, unsigned long caller)
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
 		return s;
 
-	ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE, caller);
+	ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, caller);
 
 	/* Honor the call site pointer we received. */
 	trace_kmalloc(caller, ret, size, s->size, gfpflags);
@@ -4065,7 +4071,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags,
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
 		return s;
 
-	ret = slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, caller);
+	ret = slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node, caller);
 
 	/* Honor the call site pointer we received. */
 	trace_kmalloc_node(caller, ret, size, s->size, gfpflags, node);
-- 
1.7.8.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/