[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A17B12B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 03:26:11 +0000
From: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liu, Chuansheng
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 5:20 PM
> To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH RESEND] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
>
> Because the IRQF_DISABLED as the flag is now a NOOP and has been
> deprecated and in hardirq context the interrupt is disabled.
>
> so in usb/host code:
> Removing the usage of flag IRQF_DISABLED;
> Removing the calling local_irq save/restore actions in irq
> handler usb_hcd_irq();
>
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Hi greg,
This new patch is still not OK in a right format to apply? Please let me know, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists