[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 19:34:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [ 25/95] mutex: Place lock in contended state after fastpath_lock
failure
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Once you have this patch included, could you pick up commit a76d7bd96d
as well please?
Thanks.
> ------------------
>
> From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>
> commit 0bce9c46bf3b15f485d82d7e81dabed6ebcc24b1 upstream.
>
> ARM recently moved to asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h for its mutex
> implementation after the previous implementation was found to be missing
> some crucial memory barriers. However, this has revealed some problems
> running hackbench on SMP platforms due to the way in which the
> MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER code operates.
>
> The symptoms are that a bunch of hackbench tasks are left waiting on an
> unlocked mutex and therefore never get woken up to claim it. This boils
> down to the following sequence of events:
>
> Task A Task B Task C Lock value
> 0 1
> 1 lock() 0
> 2 lock() 0
> 3 spin(A) 0
> 4 unlock() 1
> 5 lock() 0
> 6 cmpxchg(1,0) 0
> 7 contended() -1
> 8 lock() 0
> 9 spin(C) 0
> 10 unlock() 1
> 11 cmpxchg(1,0) 0
> 12 unlock() 1
>
> At this point, the lock is unlocked, but Task B is in an uninterruptible
> sleep with nobody to wake it up.
>
> This patch fixes the problem by ensuring we put the lock into the
> contended state if we fail to acquire it on the fastpath, ensuring that
> any blocked waiters are woken up when the mutex is released.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-6e9lrw2avczr0617fzl5vqb8@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> index 580a6d3..c04e0db 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,13 @@ static inline void
> __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> {
> if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1))
> - fail_fn(count);
> + /*
> + * We failed to acquire the lock, so mark it contended
> + * to ensure that any waiting tasks are woken up by the
> + * unlock slow path.
> + */
> + if (likely(atomic_xchg(count, -1) != 1))
> + fail_fn(count);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -43,7 +49,8 @@ static inline int
> __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> {
> if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1))
> - return fail_fn(count);
> + if (likely(atomic_xchg(count, -1) != 1))
> + return fail_fn(count);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists