[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:29:06 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
bfields@...ldses.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Ravishankar N <ravi.n1@...sung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fat: allocate persistent inode numbers
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes:
> What is your use case? I'm assuming current NFS support of FAT is not
> unstable behavior even with your patches. Is this true?
s/is not unstable/is still unstable/
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists