[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADysL2YTmqrEbKfbqwGWaajWqHR7njViu=47zLh89rU76gq8Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:55:17 +0530
From: "Gupta, Ramesh" <grgupta@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] OMAP:IOMMU:flush L1 and L2 caches
Hi Russell,
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:50:24AM +0530, Gupta, Ramesh wrote:
>> static void flush_iopgd_range(u32 *first, u32 *last)
>> {
>> - /* FIXME: L2 cache should be taken care of if it exists */
>> - do {
>> - asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 1 @ flush_pgd"
>> - : : "r" (first));
>> - first += L1_CACHE_BYTES / sizeof(*first);
>> - } while (first <= last);
>> + flush_iommu_mem(first, last);
>> + outer_flush_range(virt_to_phys(first), virt_to_phys(last));
>
> I think this would be safer if these operated on an area rather than a
> range - which means taking a start plus size.
>
> phys_addr_t phys = virt_to_phys(start);
>
> iommu_flush_area(start, size);
> outer_flush_range(phys, phys + size);
>
> is safer than the above if virt_to_phys() is non-linear.
Agree, I will use the area.
>
>> *iopgd = virt_to_phys(iopte) | IOPGD_TABLE;
>> - flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd);
>> + flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd + 1);
>
> And operating on a start + size also makes this kind of stuff clearer.
Sure, I will cleanup this and send an updated patch series.
Thank you for the inputs.
Best regards
Ramesh Gupta G
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists