[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120910121320.03c9dfc7@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:13:20 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] tty/serial/core: Introduce poll_init callback
> + tport = &state->port;
> + if (!(tport->flags & ASYNC_INITIALIZED) && port->ops->poll_init) {
> + mutex_lock(&tport->mutex);
> + ret = port->ops->poll_init(port);
> + /*
> + * We don't set ASYNCB_INITIALIZED as we only initialized the
> + * hw, e.g. state->xmit is still uninitialized.
> + */
> + mutex_unlock(&tport->mutex);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
What stops a parallel open or close changing ASYNC_INITIALIZED after you
test and before you lock ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists