linux-kernel - [RESEND PATCH v2] nohz: fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120910111157.3940.68948.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:43:09 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de, mhocko@...e.cz
Cc:	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2] nohz: fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of
 /proc/stat

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

Git commit 09a1d34f8535ecf9 "nohz: Make idle/iowait counter update
conditional" introduced a bug in regard to cpu hotplug. The effect is
that the number of idle ticks in the cpu summary line in /proc/stat is
still counting ticks for offline cpus.

Reproduction is easy, just start a workload that keeps all cpus busy,
switch off one or more cpus and then watch the idle field in top.
On a dual-core with one cpu 100% busy and one offline cpu you will get
something like this:

%Cpu(s): 48.7 us,  1.3 sy,  0.0 ni, 50.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
%0.0 st

The problem is that an offline cpu still has ts->idle_active == 1.
To fix this we should make sure that the cpu is online when calling
get_cpu_idle_time_us and get_cpu_iowait_time_us.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
[srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com: Rebased to current mainline]
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

Hi Thomas,

This is a resend of the patch posted by Michal at [1]. Martin had explained
the importance of this patch for fixing the bug for x86 case in [2]. (The s390
fix is already upstream, commit id cb85a6ed67e9). Could you kindly consider
taking this fix?

[1]. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1265374/focus=1266457
[2]. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1265374/focus=1276336

 fs/proc/stat.c |   14 ++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 64c3b31..e296572 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ static cputime64_t get_iowait_time(int cpu)
 
 static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
 {
-	u64 idle, idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+	u64 idle, idle_time = -1ULL;
+
+	if (cpu_online(cpu))
+		idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
 
 	if (idle_time == -1ULL)
-		/* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
+		/* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
 		idle = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE];
 	else
 		idle = usecs_to_cputime64(idle_time);
@@ -58,10 +61,13 @@ static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
 
 static u64 get_iowait_time(int cpu)
 {
-	u64 iowait, iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+	u64 iowait, iowait_time = -1ULL;
+
+	if (cpu_online(cpu))
+		iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
 
 	if (iowait_time == -1ULL)
-		/* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
+		/* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
 		iowait = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IOWAIT];
 	else
 		iowait = usecs_to_cputime64(iowait_time);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/