| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY+t9MwWewtZzpD7i4eeTxVHNk+NxSZ1E=T-k4a0mveHg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:34:15 -0700 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: ux500: Add all known I2C sub-device nodes to the HREF DT On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote: > Here we add the skeleton nodes for each of the known I2C sub-devices > currently registered on ST-Ericsson's HREF Development Platform. We > will fill these nodes in turn as the drivers are enabled for Device > Tree. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> Can't we have it the other way around (discussing patch ordering with Arnd simultaneously), so you first add the DT support to the subdevices, then add the more complete nodes to the device tree? And if you put in a device tree like this, will these devices not collide with the ones that are currently supplied from the boardfiles? I'm a bit confused here, maybe I'm not smart enough to understand this... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists