[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347280111.2101.8.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:28:31 -0500
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
bfields@...ldses.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Ravishankar N <ravi.n1@...sung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fat: allocate persistent inode numbers
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 18:32 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> What is your use case?
What Neil Brown refers to as a "general file access protocol" -
basically making a flash disk available to a small embedded network for
random-access file I/O.
The flash disk is required to interoperate with Windoze, which forces us
into VFAT-backed NFS.
> I'm assuming current NFS support of FAT is still unstable behavior even with your
> patches. Is this true?
We use lookupcache=none, which I thought had stabilized things. Based on
what Namjae has found with ESTALE on rename/drop_caches I guess there is
a hole.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS!
www.digidescorp.com Earthling, return my space modulator!"
#include <standard.disclaimer>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists