[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbZLjQVYFHcTkb+nDpYZx3qkWp=wQmOqOpMHCxroceTNpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:48:57 +0300
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Remoteproc: Translating between host and device addresses.
Hi Sjur,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Sjur BRENDELAND
<sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com> wrote:
> One way for the device to figure out the translation between
> host-physical and device-address is to peek into some CarveOut
> resource entry and compute this translation. Because a CarveOut
> resource entry contains both the host-physical-address and the
> device address for the same memory location. But this feels
> like a workaround, shouldn't we make a more explicit way of
> communicating this mapping between host-physical and device
> addresses?
Yes, we should. The plan is, when relevant, to switch to the
IOMMU-based DMA API to allocate device addresses (by programming the
IOMMUs automatically), and stop sending physical addresses remotely.
For OMAP, btw, we will still provide those device->physical
translation resource entries, because OMAP4 has a few remote
components that access the host-physical memory directly.
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists